The United States, Japan and European Union will sue china at World Trade Organization for china"s b
The United States, Japan and European Union will sue china at World Trade Organization for china's ban on rare_earth
trade.
The United States, Japan and European Union will formally ask the World Trade Organization to settle a dispute with China,
regarding rare earth minerals.
China,trade
The United States, Japan and European Union will formally ask the World Trade Organization to settle a dispute with China,
regarding rare earth minerals. The case centers around China's restrictions on exports of the valuable minerals, used in
high-tech products. It's the first such WTO dispute filed by the three economic powers.
U.S. President Barack Obama is expected to personally announce the action to join Japan and the EU in requesting
consultations with China at the WTO. This appears to be part of a broader effort by Obama to toughen his stance on trade
with China as he prepares to seek re-election in November.
U.S. President Barack Obama delivers a statement announcing new efforts to enforce
U.S. trade rights China, from the Rose Garden of the White House in Washington, March
13, 2012.
The U.S. is expected to argue that the curbs give Chinese companies an unfair advantage, meaning they can increase costs
for American firms that use rare_earths.
The EU's trade chief says China's limits on rare_earths and other exports violate international trade rules.
China's Minister of Industry and Information Technology Miao Wei has expressed his regret over the complaint. He told
state news agency Xinhua that China is actively preparing to defend itself.
A spokesman for China's Foreign Ministry calls the allegations groundless and says China's rare earths policy complies
with WTO rules.
The WTO case, first of all, was aimed to maintain an irrational global supply chain of rare_earth at the cost of China.
Rare earth metals are strategic non-renewable resources.
China is contributing tremendously to the rare_earth industry. China has 36 percent of the world's total reserves, but
accounts for some 90 percent of the world's total output.
China's rare_earth measures, including imposing export quotas, are fair and legitimate, and are simply aimed at protecting
its environment as well as its natural resources. They also conform to relevant WTO rules.
For a long time, disorderly mining of rare earth has been blamed for environmental damage in rare_earth-rich regions
across China.
Take southern part of central China's Jiangxi Province for example, it cost the local government some 38 billion yuan
(about 6 billion U.S. dollars) to restore and recover local ecological system because of excessive rare_earth
exploitation.
Two years ago, in order to control environmental damage and protect resources, China suspended the issuance of new
licenses for rare-earth prospecting and mining, imposed production caps and export quotas, and announced tougher
environmental standards for production.
Another fact is that the irrational exploitation of rare-earth in China had led to underestimation of the values of rare
earth. It is strange that the Western world has never launched "anti-dumping" measures against China's rare_earth products
as they have, more often than not, done to other China-made products, such as shoes, shirts and tires.
According to the Washington Post, in the early 1990s, the United States was still in the lead in global rare-earth supply
market, but later the country, which owns 13 million tons of reserves, one of the world's biggest, decided to stop
production, including a major mine in California.
Therefore, it is crystal clear that Western countries are aiming at pressing China to continue providing irrationally
cheap rare-earth despite serious pollution problems.
The political factors behind the moves also should not be neglected.
As the U.S. presidential election is approaching, President Obama is under huge pressure because of a still sluggish U.S. economy.
By playing the "China card," Obama perhaps is aimed at alleviating his pressure from home and his political opponents as well.
All in all, China's current policy is not designed to disrupt the world's logical demands.It is only trying to take China's rare earth industry back to the path of healthy and sustainable development.
trade.
The United States, Japan and European Union will formally ask the World Trade Organization to settle a dispute with China,
regarding rare earth minerals.
China,trade
The United States, Japan and European Union will formally ask the World Trade Organization to settle a dispute with China,
regarding rare earth minerals. The case centers around China's restrictions on exports of the valuable minerals, used in
high-tech products. It's the first such WTO dispute filed by the three economic powers.
U.S. President Barack Obama is expected to personally announce the action to join Japan and the EU in requesting
consultations with China at the WTO. This appears to be part of a broader effort by Obama to toughen his stance on trade
with China as he prepares to seek re-election in November.
U.S. President Barack Obama delivers a statement announcing new efforts to enforce
U.S. trade rights China, from the Rose Garden of the White House in Washington, March
13, 2012.
The U.S. is expected to argue that the curbs give Chinese companies an unfair advantage, meaning they can increase costs
for American firms that use rare_earths.
The EU's trade chief says China's limits on rare_earths and other exports violate international trade rules.
China's Minister of Industry and Information Technology Miao Wei has expressed his regret over the complaint. He told
state news agency Xinhua that China is actively preparing to defend itself.
A spokesman for China's Foreign Ministry calls the allegations groundless and says China's rare earths policy complies
with WTO rules.
The WTO case, first of all, was aimed to maintain an irrational global supply chain of rare_earth at the cost of China.
Rare earth metals are strategic non-renewable resources.
China is contributing tremendously to the rare_earth industry. China has 36 percent of the world's total reserves, but
accounts for some 90 percent of the world's total output.
China's rare_earth measures, including imposing export quotas, are fair and legitimate, and are simply aimed at protecting
its environment as well as its natural resources. They also conform to relevant WTO rules.
For a long time, disorderly mining of rare earth has been blamed for environmental damage in rare_earth-rich regions
across China.
Take southern part of central China's Jiangxi Province for example, it cost the local government some 38 billion yuan
(about 6 billion U.S. dollars) to restore and recover local ecological system because of excessive rare_earth
exploitation.
Two years ago, in order to control environmental damage and protect resources, China suspended the issuance of new
licenses for rare-earth prospecting and mining, imposed production caps and export quotas, and announced tougher
environmental standards for production.
Another fact is that the irrational exploitation of rare-earth in China had led to underestimation of the values of rare
earth. It is strange that the Western world has never launched "anti-dumping" measures against China's rare_earth products
as they have, more often than not, done to other China-made products, such as shoes, shirts and tires.
According to the Washington Post, in the early 1990s, the United States was still in the lead in global rare-earth supply
market, but later the country, which owns 13 million tons of reserves, one of the world's biggest, decided to stop
production, including a major mine in California.
Therefore, it is crystal clear that Western countries are aiming at pressing China to continue providing irrationally
cheap rare-earth despite serious pollution problems.
The political factors behind the moves also should not be neglected.
As the U.S. presidential election is approaching, President Obama is under huge pressure because of a still sluggish U.S. economy.
By playing the "China card," Obama perhaps is aimed at alleviating his pressure from home and his political opponents as well.
All in all, China's current policy is not designed to disrupt the world's logical demands.It is only trying to take China's rare earth industry back to the path of healthy and sustainable development.
