MEDLINE Abstracts: Osteoarthritis
MEDLINE Abstracts: Osteoarthritis
What's new concerning pharmacologic therapy for osteoarthritis? Find out in this easy-to-navigate collection of recent MEDLINE abstracts compiled by the editors at Medscape Orthopaedics.
Simon LS
Rheum Dis Clin North Am 1999;May;25(2):345-57
Pharmacologic therapy for osteoarthritis is presently only palliative and is based on the use of analgesic or anti-inflammatory agents. Simple analgesics, however, do not provide enough of an effect to satisfy the needs of many OA patients, and anti-inflammatory drugs that are currently available do not have favorable risk-to-benefit ratio in typical patients with OA. A need remains, therefore, for therapies that will be analgesic, appropriately anti-inflammatory when necessary, and that may favorably alter the natural history of the disease. The development of intra-articular hyaluronic acid (HA) supplementation was thought to fulfill these criteria. This therapy has been shown to modulate pain in OA of the knee and investigators have attempted to show that it have positive effects on articular cartilage biology. This article considers these claims for HA supplementation as an important therapy for the treatment of OA.
Wobig M, Bach G, Beks P, Dickhut A, Runzheimer J, Schwieger G, Vetter G, Balazs E
Clin Ther 1999;Sep;21(9):1549-62
The objective of this 12-week, double-masked, randomized, multicenter study was to compare the elastoviscous properties of a high-molecular-weight viscosupplement, hylan G-F 20 (polymer concentration, 0.8%), with those of a lower-molecular-weight hyaluronan (LMW HA) product (polymer concentration, 1%) and to determine the relationship of elastoviscosity to efficacy in the treatment of patients with osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee. Patients had radiographically confirmed primary idiopathic OA of the knee (Larsen grades I to V) with pain despite other treatments. After a 2-week washout period, 70 patients (73 knees) received three 2-mL intra-articular injections of test solution at 1-week intervals. Thirty-eight patients (38 knees) received hylan G-F 20, and 32 patients (35 knees) received LMW HA. During the 12-week follow-up period, the primary outcome measures assessed by patients (using a visual analogue scale) were weight-bearing pain, most painful knee movement, and overall treatment response; the primary outcome measures assessed by study evaluators were weight-bearing pain and overall assessment of treatment. The dynamic elastoviscous properties of the test solutions were measured on an oscillating Couette-type rheometer. Hylan G-F 20 was more elastoviscous than the LMW HA at all frequencies measured (0.001 to 10 Hz). At the final evaluation, patients who received hylan G-F 20 had significantly better results on all primary outcome measures compared with those who received LMW HA. No systemic adverse events were reported. Local adverse events consisted of pain or swelling, noted in 2 of 38 knees injected with hylan G-F 20, and pain, noted in 1 of 35 knees injected with LMW HA (adverse event rates per injection, 1.8% and 0.9%, respectively). The difference in the incidence of adverse events between groups was not statistically significant. The higher-molecular-weight, more elastoviscous hylan G-F 20 had significantly greater pain-relieving effects than did the lower-molecular-weight, less elastoviscous hyaluronan.
Srejic U, Calvillo O, Kabakibou K
Reg Anesth Pain Med 1999;Jan-Feb;24(1):84-8
Background and Objectives: We describe a new therapeutic modality for sacroiliac joint syndrome that represents an alternative to other treatment modalities. We report on four cases of sacroiliac joint syndrome with severe pain.
Methods: Three patients had undergone operative treatment of the lumbar spine and one patient suffered from severe osteoarthritis of the spine. All patients were diagnosed with sacroiliac joint syndrome by means of patient history, physical examination, and intra-articular local anesthetic injection preceded by sacroiliac arthrogram. All patients received three injections of Hylan GF 20 in the sacroiliac joints 2 weeks apart.
Results: Twelve to 16 weeks after the injections, the pain was reported to be 40-67% better when measured on the visual analog scale. The duration of the beneficial effect of Hylan on arthralgia and joint function was undetermined.
Conclusions: Viscosupplementation of the sacroiliac joint induced a significant degree of analgesia in all four patients. This treatment modality could represent an option in the management of sacroiliac joint pain and dysfunction.
Wobig M, Dickhut A, Maier R, Vetter G
Clin Ther 1998;May-Jun;20(3):410-23
Hylan G-F 20, which is derived from hyaluronan, is a highly purified, elastoviscous fluid with rheologic properties similar to those of synovial fluid in the knee joints of healthy young persons. The efficacy and safety of viscosupplementation with hylan G-F 20 were evaluated in a multicenter, double-masked clinical study in patients with chronic idiopathic osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee of 1 to 30 years' duration. Three intra-articular injections of 2 mL hylan G-F 20 were administered 1 week apart to 57 knees. The control group (60 knees) received 2 mL of physiologic buffered saline solution at the same intervals. Patients were predominantly female (65%), with a mean age of 62 years and mean weight of 76 kg. Using a visual analogue scale, patients assessed the following clinical variables: pain during weight-bearing, pain at rest during the night, reduction of pain during the most painful movement of the knee, and treatment success. Evaluators also assessed patients' loss of activity while performing difficult daily tasks and treatment success. There was dramatic early improvement in all six variables with hylan G-F 20 beginning after the first injection; the improvement continued through the study end points. The differences between hylan G-F 20 and saline treatment were statistically significant for all outcome measures. In the hylan G-F 20 group, 39% to 56% of patients were free or nearly free of weight-bearing pain 10 to 24 weeks after the last injection. Treatment with saline was less effective, with fewer than 13% of patients free or nearly free of weight-bearing pain. Use of rescue therapy was significantly greater in the saline group than in the hylan G-F 20 group. No adverse events were observed in the injected joint after hylan G-F 20 treatment. These results demonstrate that hylan G-F 20 is effective and well tolerated in the management of chronic idiopathic OA.
Lussier A, Cividino AA, McFarlane CA, Olszynski WP, Potashner WJ, De Medicis R
J Rheumatol 1996;Sep;23(9):1579-85
Objective: To evaluate viscosupplementation with intraarticular hylan G-F 20 in current clinical practice.
Methods: A retrospective study of all patients with osteoarthritis of the knee treated with hylan by 5 Canadian clinicians over a period of 2.5 years.
Results: A total of 1537 injections were performed in 336 patients involving 458 knees. The overall response and the change of activity level were judged better or much better for 77 and 76% of the treated knees after the first course of treatment (3 weekly injections), and 87 and 84% after a 2nd course. The mean time elapsing between the first and 2nd course, 8.2 +/- 0.5 months, is an evaluation of the duration of benefits. Local adverse events were observed in 28 patients (32 knees), with an overall rate of 2.7% adverse events per injection, 7.0% per joint, and 8.3% per patient. No systemic adverse events were noted in any patient. The adverse events were characterized by pain and/or transient swelling of the injected joint, mostly mild or moderate in intensity, and 72% of the adverse events were considered to be possibly or probably related to the injection. The incidence of adverse events is significantly influenced by the injection technique: 5.2% adverse events per injection with a medial approach to a partially bent knee, and 2.4% (straight medial) and 1.5% (straight lateral). After an adverse event, clinical improvement still occurred in 69% of the affected knees.
Conclusion: Hylan G-F 20 provided good clinical benefits and an acceptable safety profile in current clinical practice. The occurrence of adverse events after an intraarticular hylan injection is infrequent and unpredictable and is not necessarily hylan related, although injection related.
What's new concerning pharmacologic therapy for osteoarthritis? Find out in this easy-to-navigate collection of recent MEDLINE abstracts compiled by the editors at Medscape Orthopaedics.
Simon LS
Rheum Dis Clin North Am 1999;May;25(2):345-57
Pharmacologic therapy for osteoarthritis is presently only palliative and is based on the use of analgesic or anti-inflammatory agents. Simple analgesics, however, do not provide enough of an effect to satisfy the needs of many OA patients, and anti-inflammatory drugs that are currently available do not have favorable risk-to-benefit ratio in typical patients with OA. A need remains, therefore, for therapies that will be analgesic, appropriately anti-inflammatory when necessary, and that may favorably alter the natural history of the disease. The development of intra-articular hyaluronic acid (HA) supplementation was thought to fulfill these criteria. This therapy has been shown to modulate pain in OA of the knee and investigators have attempted to show that it have positive effects on articular cartilage biology. This article considers these claims for HA supplementation as an important therapy for the treatment of OA.
Wobig M, Bach G, Beks P, Dickhut A, Runzheimer J, Schwieger G, Vetter G, Balazs E
Clin Ther 1999;Sep;21(9):1549-62
The objective of this 12-week, double-masked, randomized, multicenter study was to compare the elastoviscous properties of a high-molecular-weight viscosupplement, hylan G-F 20 (polymer concentration, 0.8%), with those of a lower-molecular-weight hyaluronan (LMW HA) product (polymer concentration, 1%) and to determine the relationship of elastoviscosity to efficacy in the treatment of patients with osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee. Patients had radiographically confirmed primary idiopathic OA of the knee (Larsen grades I to V) with pain despite other treatments. After a 2-week washout period, 70 patients (73 knees) received three 2-mL intra-articular injections of test solution at 1-week intervals. Thirty-eight patients (38 knees) received hylan G-F 20, and 32 patients (35 knees) received LMW HA. During the 12-week follow-up period, the primary outcome measures assessed by patients (using a visual analogue scale) were weight-bearing pain, most painful knee movement, and overall treatment response; the primary outcome measures assessed by study evaluators were weight-bearing pain and overall assessment of treatment. The dynamic elastoviscous properties of the test solutions were measured on an oscillating Couette-type rheometer. Hylan G-F 20 was more elastoviscous than the LMW HA at all frequencies measured (0.001 to 10 Hz). At the final evaluation, patients who received hylan G-F 20 had significantly better results on all primary outcome measures compared with those who received LMW HA. No systemic adverse events were reported. Local adverse events consisted of pain or swelling, noted in 2 of 38 knees injected with hylan G-F 20, and pain, noted in 1 of 35 knees injected with LMW HA (adverse event rates per injection, 1.8% and 0.9%, respectively). The difference in the incidence of adverse events between groups was not statistically significant. The higher-molecular-weight, more elastoviscous hylan G-F 20 had significantly greater pain-relieving effects than did the lower-molecular-weight, less elastoviscous hyaluronan.
Srejic U, Calvillo O, Kabakibou K
Reg Anesth Pain Med 1999;Jan-Feb;24(1):84-8
Background and Objectives: We describe a new therapeutic modality for sacroiliac joint syndrome that represents an alternative to other treatment modalities. We report on four cases of sacroiliac joint syndrome with severe pain.
Methods: Three patients had undergone operative treatment of the lumbar spine and one patient suffered from severe osteoarthritis of the spine. All patients were diagnosed with sacroiliac joint syndrome by means of patient history, physical examination, and intra-articular local anesthetic injection preceded by sacroiliac arthrogram. All patients received three injections of Hylan GF 20 in the sacroiliac joints 2 weeks apart.
Results: Twelve to 16 weeks after the injections, the pain was reported to be 40-67% better when measured on the visual analog scale. The duration of the beneficial effect of Hylan on arthralgia and joint function was undetermined.
Conclusions: Viscosupplementation of the sacroiliac joint induced a significant degree of analgesia in all four patients. This treatment modality could represent an option in the management of sacroiliac joint pain and dysfunction.
Wobig M, Dickhut A, Maier R, Vetter G
Clin Ther 1998;May-Jun;20(3):410-23
Hylan G-F 20, which is derived from hyaluronan, is a highly purified, elastoviscous fluid with rheologic properties similar to those of synovial fluid in the knee joints of healthy young persons. The efficacy and safety of viscosupplementation with hylan G-F 20 were evaluated in a multicenter, double-masked clinical study in patients with chronic idiopathic osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee of 1 to 30 years' duration. Three intra-articular injections of 2 mL hylan G-F 20 were administered 1 week apart to 57 knees. The control group (60 knees) received 2 mL of physiologic buffered saline solution at the same intervals. Patients were predominantly female (65%), with a mean age of 62 years and mean weight of 76 kg. Using a visual analogue scale, patients assessed the following clinical variables: pain during weight-bearing, pain at rest during the night, reduction of pain during the most painful movement of the knee, and treatment success. Evaluators also assessed patients' loss of activity while performing difficult daily tasks and treatment success. There was dramatic early improvement in all six variables with hylan G-F 20 beginning after the first injection; the improvement continued through the study end points. The differences between hylan G-F 20 and saline treatment were statistically significant for all outcome measures. In the hylan G-F 20 group, 39% to 56% of patients were free or nearly free of weight-bearing pain 10 to 24 weeks after the last injection. Treatment with saline was less effective, with fewer than 13% of patients free or nearly free of weight-bearing pain. Use of rescue therapy was significantly greater in the saline group than in the hylan G-F 20 group. No adverse events were observed in the injected joint after hylan G-F 20 treatment. These results demonstrate that hylan G-F 20 is effective and well tolerated in the management of chronic idiopathic OA.
Lussier A, Cividino AA, McFarlane CA, Olszynski WP, Potashner WJ, De Medicis R
J Rheumatol 1996;Sep;23(9):1579-85
Objective: To evaluate viscosupplementation with intraarticular hylan G-F 20 in current clinical practice.
Methods: A retrospective study of all patients with osteoarthritis of the knee treated with hylan by 5 Canadian clinicians over a period of 2.5 years.
Results: A total of 1537 injections were performed in 336 patients involving 458 knees. The overall response and the change of activity level were judged better or much better for 77 and 76% of the treated knees after the first course of treatment (3 weekly injections), and 87 and 84% after a 2nd course. The mean time elapsing between the first and 2nd course, 8.2 +/- 0.5 months, is an evaluation of the duration of benefits. Local adverse events were observed in 28 patients (32 knees), with an overall rate of 2.7% adverse events per injection, 7.0% per joint, and 8.3% per patient. No systemic adverse events were noted in any patient. The adverse events were characterized by pain and/or transient swelling of the injected joint, mostly mild or moderate in intensity, and 72% of the adverse events were considered to be possibly or probably related to the injection. The incidence of adverse events is significantly influenced by the injection technique: 5.2% adverse events per injection with a medial approach to a partially bent knee, and 2.4% (straight medial) and 1.5% (straight lateral). After an adverse event, clinical improvement still occurred in 69% of the affected knees.
Conclusion: Hylan G-F 20 provided good clinical benefits and an acceptable safety profile in current clinical practice. The occurrence of adverse events after an intraarticular hylan injection is infrequent and unpredictable and is not necessarily hylan related, although injection related.
